Related Quote #1: “Our [modern] era prefers the image to
the thing, the copy to the original, the representation to the reality,
appearance to being.” —Ludwig Feuerbach, preface to the 1843 edition of The Essence of Christianity.
Related Quote #2: “The powers of photography have in
effect de-Platonized our understanding of reality, making it less and less
plausible to reflect upon our experience according to the distinction between
images and things, between copies and originals. It suited Plato’s derogatory
attitude toward images to liken them to shadows—transitory, minimally
informative, immaterial, impotent co-presences of the real things which cast
them. But the force of photographic images comes from their being material
realities in their own right, richly informative deposits left in the wake of
whatever emitted them, potent means for turning the tables on reality—for
turning it into a shadow. Images are more real than anyone could have
supposed.” —Susan Sontag, On Photography
(1977)
Related Quote #3: “Cinema is the ultimate pervert’s art.
It doesn't give you what you desire—it tells you how to desire.” —Slavoj Zizek,
The Pervert’s Guide to the Cinema
(2006).
Terms
1. Plato’s Theory of Forms: The
idea that behind the flux of phenomenal appearances lies an immutable realm of
non-material abstract (but substantial) forms (or ideas) that possess the
highest and most fundamental kind of reality. The Form (or Idea) is an
aspacial, atemporal, objective blueprint of perfection, as contrasted with the Icon (image/appearance), which is merely the Form’s particular aspect, which exists materially and temporally. According to this theory, each concrete particular
is an imitation of its abstract and eternal Form.
Study Questions
Answer any six of the following.
1.Briefly describe the narrative structure of the story.
2. Perversion and voyeurism are at the
heart of this work. How might the story be cited as evidence for Zizek’s claim
(quoted above) that film is “the ultimate pervert’s art” in that it “doesn't
give you what you desire—it tells you how to desire”? In other words, how is
this monstrosity called Mr. Bluemound to some extent the creation of Mr.
Nakada?
3. Explain Mr. Bluemound’s theory about
“originals” and “copies,” “forms” and “shadows,” and how this theory relates to
his obsession with Yurako. In his view, what is most primary/real?
4. “Yurako” is described in various
ways throughout the story, but the “real” Yurako is never known or revealed.
List and describe each of these representations/manifestations of Yura. What
does Tanizaki seem to be suggesting by never revealing to us “the real” Yurako?
5. The relation between Mr. Bluemound
and his blow-up doll seems to parallel or mirror—albeit in a rather grotesque
way—the relationship between Mr. Nakada and Yurako. Discuss this analogic
structure of the work.
6. At the end of his letter, Mr. Nakada
states that he is no longer capable of loving Yurako, and that he is resigned
to die. What was it about his encounter with Mr. Bluemound that was so
radically transformative?
7. List and describe all of the
grotesque elements of this work. What do you think Tanizaki was trying to
convey by making the story so outrageously grotesque?
8. It is well known that Tanizaki was throughout
his life a committed foot fetishist. Identify the descriptions of feet in this
work. Why do you think Tanizaki’s characters are so often attracted to the feet
of beautiful young females?
9. Describe the transformation that
occurs in Mr. Bluemound—or at least in Mr. Nakada’s perception of
him—throughout the story.
10. What do you think Mr. Nakada’s
motives were in explaining this episode to his wife? Couldn’t he have just died
without telling her about it?
11. Do you detect any Buddhist
elements/themes/overtones in the work? Explain.
12. Mr. Nakada could have gotten up and
walked away from the creepy Mr. Bluemound at any point in their conversation.
What motivates him to stay?
13. Although not described in the
story, what do you think Yurako’s reaction to the letter was? Explain.
14. What do you think Tanizaki was to
trying convey—about film/photographs/sexual desire in the modern world/women
and their representations/the male gaze/appearance vs. reality/etc.—by writing
this story?

2 comments:
Eidos is another conjugation of idea. You meant to write "icon."
The book I was reading said something else, but you're right! Thank you!
Post a Comment